Search Forum
Blog Entry# 1213364
Posted: Sep 12 2014 (19:51)
4 Responses
Last Response: Sep 13 2014 (14:19)
4 Responses
Last Response: Sep 13 2014 (14:19)
hi to everyone first of all why ir,scr,sr,swr,ecor neglecting manchiryal station not giving new train halts giving preference to ramgundam and sirpur kagaznagar. more than 50% of mci people are boarding at rdm n skzr better give new train halts to mci or remove all trains give one bhagyanagar singareni passengers thats it shame on scr...
Priorities man........it all comes down to priorities.It's not that the officials are not aware of it but development/modernization/upgradation always starts from up top and then proceeds further down.Say Hyderabad - Warangal/Kazipet - Khammam or Mahboobnagar and then further downwards..........just an example.That's how it was.....is........and always will be unless they see some potentially huge earnings from freight,they won't touch a new upcoming or a small station.
Ya its true. All important trains should be given halt here. SCR neglecting it.
mci is not a small station it is a upcoming new district in telangana see todays paper and all earnings at rdm n skzr are of mci people only more than 60% earnings at rdm n skzr are mci only...
Just browse the pnr search for the trains of ap, gt, dakshin and ap-sk'nti trains, which are halt at rdm, mci, skzr. Enter these stn codes in pnr search indivisually. You will find wait list and which stns ( rdm, mci, skzr) people are travelling to long distance. Chandrapur is districr headquarter, but more trains halt at bpq. Skzr is in forest area and need as many as more trains, due to large gap between rdm and bpq. Khammam is bigger than rdm but less halts at khammam, since it is in between bza- wl with well connected road from bza and WL in addition to more passenger/ exp trains.