Search Forum
Blog Entry# 1398047
Posted: Mar 16 2015 (11:52)
15 Responses
Last Response: Mar 16 2015 (21:38)
15 Responses
Last Response: Mar 16 2015 (21:38)
Mar 16 2015 (11:52) 17064/Ajanta Express (PT) | CSTM/Mumbai CSM Terminus (18 PFs)
sumanth chowdary
sumanth chowdary 3914 blog posts10 Posts
PG and RTI is good option
in entire NED div we have only pit lines at NED.
AWB/NSL can have 1 pit line atleast like how NS and MTM managing
I think pitline at NSL can be easily considered as IR may smartly reply in RTI as NED and AWB are located nearby so consideration of pitline facility is not feasible...
in entire NED div we have only pit lines at NED.
AWB/NSL can have 1 pit line atleast like how NS and MTM managing
I think pitline at NSL can be easily considered as IR may smartly reply in RTI as NED and AWB are located nearby so consideration of pitline facility is not feasible...
If nearby location is criteria...then pit line should not be at NSL as it is only 23 km from MMR and MMR has pit line facility (though it belongs to CR)..Bidar HYB distance is only 165 KM but still SCR is constructing pit line there. NS-BZA distance is only 140km but NS has pit line..AWB -NED distance is 236 KM but still there is no pit line....that means if SCR want they can construct pit line at AWB and more than NSL; AWB needs pit line as the city needs connectivity with whole India not like NSL; only for Shirdi from south India. also NSL terminating trains can easily be maintained at AWB. NSL falls in sever water scarcity region so pit line is not a viable option...there is no big city in vicinity, so will pose problems to employees and their families.
That is why i mentioned as "Smart reply"
There need not be any distance constraint for Pitlines.
There need not be any distance constraint for Pitlines.
via HX veyala....
Elago nenu devagiri ni extend ceyamananu to BZA/GDR
Elago nenu devagiri ni extend ceyamananu to BZA/GDR