Search Forum
Blog Entry# 1937685
Posted: Jul 22 2016 (13:28)
24 Responses
Last Response: Aug 14 2016 (21:57)
24 Responses
Last Response: Aug 14 2016 (21:57)
Reply from Railway Board
Date of Receipt : 25 Mar 2016
Received by : Ministry of Railways, ( Railway Board)
Forwarded to : Electrical Engg Directorate
Contact Address : Room No 111 First Floor,
Rail...
more...
Date of Receipt : 25 Mar 2016
Received by : Ministry of Railways, ( Railway Board)
Forwarded to : Electrical Engg Directorate
Contact Address : Room No 111 First Floor,
Rail...
more...
1 Public Posts - Wed Aug 10, 2016
8 Public Posts - Thu Aug 11, 2016
7 Public Posts - Fri Aug 12, 2016
First of all, what is the most sensible thing to do? Homing WAP5 locos at KYN, which is 800 km away from the high speed corridor or AQ, which lies within the corridor? AQ would be preferable, right? I'm placing my bet on AQ only. KYN ain't getting any WAP7, forget about WAP5.
Don't compare the operations of one zone with another. CR need not copy the policies of NR or WR or any other zone for that matter.
P5 hauled 22109 at 110 MPS last year, not 120. Before that, only once,...
more...
Don't compare the operations of one zone with another. CR need not copy the policies of NR or WR or any other zone for that matter.
P5 hauled 22109 at 110 MPS last year, not 120. Before that, only once,...
more...
4 Public Posts - Sat Aug 13, 2016
3 Public Posts - Sun Aug 14, 2016