Search Forum
Blog Entry# 2082108
Posted: Dec 06 2016 (15:11)
11 Responses
Last Response: Dec 11 2016 (15:00)
11 Responses
Last Response: Dec 11 2016 (15:00)
With same CC of 12397 and 12389, It can be inferred that this train has RSA with 12389/90. Also, it can be seen that 12397 always departed ontime till 3rd December despite its incoming rake was late by 12+ hours. 12389 was rescheduled on Sunday, and on Sunday (4th Dec), 12397 departed GAYA 18 hours late, just becoz there was no extra rake that day! With rd rake (12389) sent to Chennai, yesterday also it couldn't depart ontime, and hence cancelled yesterday!
1 Public Posts - Wed Dec 07, 2016
2 Public Posts - Thu Dec 08, 2016
5 Public Posts - Fri Dec 09, 2016
Might be to check all minor adjustments or something!
But u can see the departure timings of 12397 and arrival of 12398!
Whenever 12390's rake was present, it always departed ontime, irrespective of 12398 coming over 20 hours!
And when 12389 wasn't there, 12397 was rescheduled, and in fact 1 run was cancelled!
BTW...
more...
But u can see the departure timings of 12397 and arrival of 12398!
Whenever 12390's rake was present, it always departed ontime, irrespective of 12398 coming over 20 hours!
And when 12389 wasn't there, 12397 was rescheduled, and in fact 1 run was cancelled!
BTW...
more...
2 Public Posts - Sun Dec 11, 2016