Search Forum
Blog Entry# 5700485
Posted: Apr 21 2023 (12:50)
9 Responses
Last Response: Sep 22 2023 (18:08)
9 Responses
Last Response: Sep 22 2023 (18:08)
Apr 21 2023 (12:50) 15012/Chandigarh - Lucknow Jn. Express | STP/Sitapur Junction (6 PFs)
PKSNER~
PKSNER~ 2477 blog postsThis should be run via Sitapur so that passengers of Sitapur will get a regular train to Chandigarh.
4 Posts
refer /atlas
as you know ASH - STP was MG earlier. Hence had no connectivity then.
if u remember, 12583/84 was proposed to b diverted via STP through this route.
as you know ASH - STP was MG earlier. Hence had no connectivity then.
if u remember, 12583/84 was proposed to b diverted via STP through this route.
Yes, I remember the MG days and the Nainital Express chugging off from ASH :p
I have seen the atlas. It makes sense now. The train will cross via Sitapur Jn, Sitapur Cutchery [ which I did capture once here /blog/post/5599884/0 ] and Sitapur City.
I have seen the atlas. It makes sense now. The train will cross via Sitapur Jn, Sitapur Cutchery [ which I did capture once here /blog/post/5599884/0 ] and Sitapur City.
I had seen your station coverage of STRK then. /blog/post/5599884
I had questions for u.
why is it operational even ?
is wasting IR resources (employees) dere ?
...
more...
I had questions for u.
why is it operational even ?
is wasting IR resources (employees) dere ?
...
more...
I do not know why it is operational. Halt stations are relatively common but atleast they are more built than this and at least, some distance.
There are workers near the station since there is a goods siding track but I would assume majority of them would be locals only, so no benefit to them, either. Considering the lack of infrastructure, I think IR should just close this joke of a station.
There are workers near the station since there is a goods siding track but I would assume majority of them would be locals only, so no benefit to them, either. Considering the lack of infrastructure, I think IR should just close this joke of a station.