Search Forum
Blog Entry# 6059292
Posted: May 10 (17:34)
7 Responses
Last Response: May 13 (17:51)
7 Responses
Last Response: May 13 (17:51)
Commentary/Human Interest
SWR/South Western
Exynos9611~ 12433 news posts
ಗದಗ ಜಿಲ್ಲೆರೈಲ್ವೆಯ ಯೋಜನೆ ಅನುಷ್ಠಾನದಲ್ಲಿ ನಿರಂತರವಾಗಿ ಅನ್ಯಾಯಕ್ಕೆ ಒಳಗಾಗುತ್ತಿದ್ದರೂ ಜನಪ್ರತಿನಿಧಿಗಳು ಮಾತ್ರ ಮೌನ ಮುರಿಯುತ್ತಿಲ್ಲ. ಒಂದೆಡೆ ಅಮೃತ ರೈಲ್ವೆ ನಿಲ್ದಾಣ ಯೋಜನೆಯಡಿ 23.05 ಕೋಟಿ ರೂ.ವೆಚ್ಚದಲ್ಲಿಗದಗ ರೈಲ್ವೆ ನಿಲ್ದಾಣ ಹೊಸದಾಗಿ ತಲೆ ಎತ್ತುತ್ತಿದ್ದರೆ ಮತ್ತೊಂದೆಡೆ ರೈಲುಗಳ...
2 Posts
These people are over reacting. When nig stations like BZA, BRC are getting bypassed what's wrong in this. Only thing is a proper connectivity must be established to GDG bypass
The main trains which have good footfalls and connected within the state like GolGumbaz should be not be diverted when the bypass station is not centrally located and convenient in the towns and cities.
In Vijayawada the trains are diverted only in night which don't have any requirement from public in that section(short distance within AP) and only 2 weekly trains are only diverted.
In Vijayawada the trains are diverted only in night which don't have any requirement from public in that section(short distance within AP) and only 2 weekly trains are only diverted.
If proper connectivity (public transport) to that city is ensured from that byepassing station, then byepass should not be an issue i guess. be it podanur, Gadag byepass, rayanapadu, etc..
30 mins of loco change and reversal understandable but why to bypass main stations
Existing trains are required to run via Gadag. New trains can be via bypass. For example, if new Hubli Gulbarga or Vijayapura Mysore or Solapur Vasco are introduced, they can go via bypass