Search Forum
Blog Entry# 952254
Posted: Jan 01 2014 (18:10)
34 Responses
Last Response: Jan 02 2014 (13:49)
34 Responses
Last Response: Jan 02 2014 (13:49)
Jan 01 2014 (18:10) 22110X/Hazrat Nizamuddin - Mumbai LTT AC SF Express
Pratik~
Pratik~ 5604 blog postsArrived at first halt Agra 18:07 ...just 9 mins late no overtake by Chennai Rajdhani yet
29 Posts
Not allowed to overtake trains like Sachkand,Shridham is the big factor. In this run it trailed Sachkand for a good 490 kms right from Bina to Nepanagar when the overtake was actually supposed to happen at Bina itself(as per TT). AC exp was allowed to overtake Sachkand only at Nepanagar(That too when it entered into CR's territory). Result,delay of 1 hrs 42 mins which could have been nil if it was allowed clear run in this sector. Alas!
Since there have been numerous debates about loco's. And what i have seen is WAP4 is equally capable for 110's, 130's and 150's. But what i believe the LP's given for Shatabdi's/RAJ's/Duronto's marks the difference. Im sure, these premium train LP's are majorly given these trains only because they need to run a tad higher than normal SF's.
.
Case 1. NZM-AGC section.- If track is fit for 130 and 150, then why WAP4 of AC is not doing 130's and 150's as Raj is doing coming from behind. Since it is the...
more...
.
Case 1. NZM-AGC section.- If track is fit for 130 and 150, then why WAP4 of AC is not doing 130's and 150's as Raj is doing coming from behind. Since it is the...
more...
lol.. rajdhani h , koi majaak nahi h .. aise bina baat ke koi bhi controller delay nahi ker sakta
tn has avg speed of 80 kmph .. it arrives all station 10-20 min early