Search Forum
Blog Entry# 1883345
Posted: Jun 07 2016 (00:20)
5 Responses
Last Response: Jun 14 2016 (22:50)
5 Responses
Last Response: Jun 14 2016 (22:50)
Should the Decision of IR of 3-Phase Link withdrawal from 12259/12260 is justified ?
NO vote
Yes It's absolutely justified IR has taken the Correct Decision by giving the Charge of this Train to WAP-4
22%
8
No IR has taken Completely wrong decision by withdrawing WAP-5/WAP-7 from this Train as 3-Phase Link was better than the Present Link with this Train
67%
24
Don't have any idea regarding this
11%
4
Could any body explain what happened? Is the 3-phase link[which was withdrawn] superior to the newly given link?
I dont think rlys action regarding links are justified/not. But when you start conversation with some LP or any other staff those who know about the link will give you an answer like, which ever loco is available we use it for xyz train(xyz can be any train and sometimes at HWH and NDLS I came to know about WAP-7's that they are specifically for the Rajdhanis and long hauler with lots of stoppages).
Coming to the voting topic, When Poorva was in ICF mode , it had 24 coaches and ICF coaches are heavier than LHB so why they didn't gave WAP-7 earlier as the way Kalka was provided.
If...
more...
Coming to the voting topic, When Poorva was in ICF mode , it had 24 coaches and ICF coaches are heavier than LHB so why they didn't gave WAP-7 earlier as the way Kalka was provided.
If...
more...
May give WAP 7 still punctuality will be same punctuality will improve then only when NCR will not it troll behind 12560 till ALD or unless 12560 get 130 MPs if get them good for fastest dur otherwise going to never ending problem
However in terms of punctuality 12259 is much better as does not have to troll any SF train in NCR whereas in case of 12260 totally opposite as NCR did not allow to overtake 12560